In the newspaper business, second-guessing is second nature to an editor’s inbox. “Why did you …” is a question I answer daily. Usually quickly, because another question is always waiting.
So I didn’t linger over my answer to an email from a local banker asking why we “celebrated a cheating athlete” with our story on George Hincapie’s upcoming Gran Fondo charity ride. He referenced Hincapie’s role in the doping scandal linked to Lance Armstrong’s Tour de France wins and asked, “Is this the best we can do in Greenville?”
I told him I shared his dislike for performance enhancing drugs. However, Hincapie confessed and was sanctioned and remains a newsworthy figure. Hence our news story. I invited him to share his views in a letter to the editor and moved on to the next email.
Then his reply arrived. The question is not why you wrote about Hincapie, he said. “I agree he is a newsworthy figure. My question was why this event is even going on” in light of the confessed cheating, and why “there was no mention of that in your article?”
That earned some second-guessing. Several hours’ worth, in fact. The short answer: I didn’t think it relevant to a story about a charity ride for Meals on Wheels. The question I kept returning to was harder: how long does a scandal stick?
To be honest, it’s not something I consciously ask. The choice is instinctive, story-by-story. I know, for example, that whatever we write about Greenville entrepreneur John Ludwig will include the speeding Maserati crushing Bill Bardsley on his living room couch. But we left the doping slice of Hincapie’s past out of our UBJ stories on Hotel Domestique, and our cover piece on the business of cycling last month.
I thought long about why – and came back to my original reply. Hincapie confessed and paid with a six-month ban and the loss of two years of professional titles. He says he’s raced clean since 2006. He’s worked to purge doping from the sport.
I know you’re thinking this, so I’ll say it: he’s also part of the Greenville brand. Was this just about protecting the brand?
No; it was about the man. This isn’t Barry Bonds babbling about flax seed oil and famous fathers. George Hincapie remains deeply admired by professionals and fans. The reason for that staying power is the reputation he still holds.
Maybe I’m wrong; maybe a scandal that big should stick forever. You can’t say Monica without thinking Bill.
But you won’t read her name in every story about the man, either. Some scandals are so well known they become their own coda. Readers don’t need us to fill them in.
Upstate Business Journal | 09.20.2013